Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
... after a short break.
Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar". So which are you?
Not sane? Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is
incapable of conceding them? Or lying when you describe Peter? You
must surely have better things to do. Meanwhile, you surely noticed
that Peter is running rings around you.
Peter -- you surely have better things to do. No-one sensible
is reading the repetitive stuff. Decades, and myriads of articles, ago
people here tried to help you knock your points into shape, but anything
sensible is swamped by the insults. Free advice, worth roughly what you
are paying for it: step back, and summarise [from scratch, not using HHH
and DDD (etc) without explanation] (a) what it is you think you are trying
to prove and (b) what progress you claim to have made. No more than one
side of paper. Assume that people who don't actively insult you are, in
fact, trying to help.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.