Re: And the Richer Petard Horror Show resumes ...

On 10/9/2024 2:34 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:

On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:

... after a short break.

 

      Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which are you?
Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is
incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe Peter?  You
must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely noticed
that Peter is running rings around you.

 

In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the truth.

 Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and doing
so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously close
to stalking.  It detracts from the substance of your posts,

His posts never have any actual substance.
My posts do have substance yet people have made up their
minds and closed them so they never notice.
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
One cannot simply ignore the actual behavior specified by the
finite string x86 machine language of DDD such that
DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH that can possibly exist
never returns
thus each of the directly executed HHH emulators that does return
0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior for its input.
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm x86utm operating system

and makes
them, for me at least, thoroughly unpleasant to read.  Although I only
occasionally post on comp.theory, I still lurk.  Most of your posts I
merely skim over or leave wholly unread for the above reason.  Please
consider returning to a more civil way of posting, even when replying to
Peter Olcott.
 [ .... ]
 

--
Copyright 2024 Olcott
"Talent hits a target no one else can hit;
  Genius hits a target no one else can see."
  Arthur Schopenhauer