Re: And the Richer Petard Horror Show resumes ...

On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said:

Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:

On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:

... after a short break.

 

    Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which are you?
Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is
incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe Peter?  You
must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely noticed
that Peter is running rings around you.

 

In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the truth.

 Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and doing
so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously close
to stalking.

Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it
needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are
reading a liar.

It detracts from the substance of your posts, and makes
them, for me at least, thoroughly unpleasant to read.

You probably needn't read them. As soon you find out that they repeat
the same over and over, neither correcting their substantial errors
not improving their arguments you have read enough.
--
Mikko