Re: HHH(DDD)==0

On 2024-10-09 11:06:27 +0000, olcott said:

On 10/9/2024 5:08 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-09 03:47:10 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 10/8/2024 7:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
 > Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
 > someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which are you?
 > Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is
 > incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe Peter?  You
 > must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely noticed
 > that Peter is running rings around you.
 I am incapable of conceding this self-evident truth:
    DDD emulated by each corresponding HHH that can possibly
   exist never returns

 That is not self-evident or even meaningful without a definition of
"each corresponding HHH".

An HHH/DDD pair such that DDD calls its own emulator.

That does not mean anything as you have not yet said what "an
HHH/DDD pair" means.
--
Mikko