Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 12/10/2024 23:07, joes wrote:Sadly that is not true.Am Sat, 12 Oct 2024 14:21:14 -0500 schrieb olcott:The only one here besides me that seems to understand the actual
software engineering aspects of this is Mike.
Everyone else here seems to have no deeper understanding than
learn-by-rote from CS textbook.I wonder what difference you see in him?I think it's just because occasionally I make some statement that PO interprets as supporting him. He is desparate for ANYONE to NOT say that every single thing he says is false. Also there is probably an element of PO just trying to goad me into posting again, although I can't see what he hopes to gain from that.
>
For the record, I don't agree with any of PO's arguments or wider conclusions about "refuting" anything. The sort of post I've made that gets PO exited is where I've said that one plausible interpretation of one detailed point he said is correct. (Gasp! But that shouldn't really be shocking - after all, even a stopped clock is right twice a day! :))
Also, I don't consider any of those conclusions would be remotely contentious from the perspective of anyone else posting here. I would expect they would all agree with the conclusion
/given the interpretation I set out/,
and moreover would /always/ have agreed to it had PO expressed it clearly that way from the start.That is also untrue.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.