Re: Richard given an official cease-and-desist order regarding counter-factual libelous statements

On 10/13/2024 3:06 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-12 19:44:06 +0000, olcott said:

 My point HERE AND NOW is that DDD emulated by every
HHH that can possibly exist cannot possibly reach
its own return instruction NO MATTER WHAT HHH DOES.

 That does not mean anything as long as you don't define "every HHH"

 void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
 The only requirement for HHH is that it is an emulator that
emulates more than zero steps of DDD. HHH also must be able
to emulate itself emulating DDD.
 

so that one can determine whether a HHH that emulates whatever is
given as input except that instead of emulating its own code (it
it is called) as "return 1;" only is included in "every HHH".
 

 This is out-of-scope. The scope is already 100% fully
specified above.