Re: ChatGPT refutes the key rebuttal of my work

On 10/14/2024 6:21 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/14/24 5:49 AM, olcott wrote:

On 10/14/2024 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-13 12:53:12 +0000, olcott said:
>

Although it is possible for LLM systems to lie:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucination_(artificial_intelligence)
>
ChatGPT does correctly apply truth preserving operations to
the premises that it was provided regarding the behavior of
DDD and HHH. *Try to find a mistake in its reasoning*

>
No reasoning shown.
>

>
https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>
When you click on the link and try to explain how HHH must
be wrong when it reports that DDD does not terminate because
DDD does terminate it will explain your mistake to you.
>
>

 No, it admits that DDD does halt, but that HHH must be correct to say it doesn't, ... because of the lies you told it.
 

It proves that it has a much deeper understanding than
anything that I told it.

Its reasoning is based on the incorrect presumption that the HHH that DDD calls is not part of the program DDD,

(1) DDD never has been a program it is a C function.
(2) HHH does correctly emulated itself emulating DDD
     this <is> a contiguous sequence of computation.

because you have broken the definition of a program.

I am not the one saying that a C function <is> a program.
You should not be so sloppy in your use of terminology.
DDD emulated by HHH including HHH emulating itself
emulating DDD is a contiguous sequence of computation.
It is not and never has been a program. I think of
DDD and HHH as virtual machines.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer