Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 2024-10-15 12:33:47 +0000, olcott said:Not at all. If reviewers are lying about my work
On 10/15/2024 3:54 AM, Mikko wrote:While agreement with a definition is incorrect in some sense oneOn 2024-10-14 16:05:20 +0000, olcott said:>
>A stipulative definition is a type of definition in which>
a new or currently existing term is given a new specific
meaning for the purposes of argument or discussion in a
given context. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stipulative_definition
>
*Disagreeing with a stipulative definition is incorrect*
The Wikipedia page does not say that. It only says that a stipulative
definition itself cannot be correct.
If X cannot be incorrect then disagreeing that X is correct
is incorrect.
can choose whether to accept the or reject the definition.
Irrelevant.It says nothing about disagreement.>
In particular, one may diagree with the usefulness of a stipulative
definition.
It seems that my reviewers on this forum make being disagreeable
a top priority.
"properly qualified"No, it applies only to the contributions of the author and of those whoThe article also says that the scope of a stipulative definition is>
restricted to an argument or discussion in given context.
Once a stipulated definition is provided by its author it continues
to apply to every use of this term when properly qualified.
use the term without giving a different definition, and only in the
discussion where it was presented.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.