Re: ChatGPT refutes the key rebuttal of my work

On 10/16/24 12:39 PM, olcott wrote:

On 10/16/2024 11:23 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-15 12:57:25 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 10/15/2024 3:33 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-14 15:18:43 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 10/14/2024 7:06 AM, joes wrote:

Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:49:22 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 10/14/2024 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-13 12:53:12 +0000, olcott said:
>

Although it is possible for LLM systems to lie:

>

ChatGPT does correctly apply truth preserving operations to the
premises that it was provided regarding the behavior of DDD and HHH.
*Try to find a mistake in its reasoning*

>
No reasoning shown.
>

https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
When you click on the link and try to explain how HHH must be wrong when
it reports that DDD does not terminate because DDD does terminate it
will explain your mistake to you.

It is nonsensical for HHH not to report that DDD terminates.
>

The explanation is quite good. I will take what you said
to mean that it was over your head or didn't bother to
look at it.
>
You never confirmed that you even know what infinite
recursion is.

>
Could you confirm that you know whether there is an infinite recursion
in DDD?
>

>
Recursive emulation is isomorphic to recursion.
>
The following is to be understood only within my
stipulative definitions of terms provided in my first
reply to you today.
>
Recursive emulation that does not have a termination
condition within the c function under test is infinite.
>
This refers to my stipulative definition of terms
provided in my first reply to you. To the best of my
knowledge these definitions are also industry standard.

>
This can be interpreted as an overly verbose 'No'.
>

 I will equally say that you are wrong.
 

WHich just proves that you know you have no correct basis for your claims and know you are just a pathological liar.