Re: What I told ChatGPT is essentially identical to the first page of my paper

On 10/20/2024 10:19 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/20/24 6:42 PM, olcott wrote:

On 10/20/2024 4:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/20/24 4:23 PM, olcott wrote:

On 10/20/2024 2:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 10/20/24 1:33 PM, olcott wrote:

This is the only new material that sums up the
essence of what a simulating termination analyzer is.
>
Termination Analyzer HHH simulates its input until
it detects a non-terminating behavior pattern. When
HHH detects such a pattern it aborts its simulation
and returns 0.

>
But for the pattern that it detects to be correct, it must be that all input that exhibit that pattern must never halt when run.
>

>
If your try to get away with telling ChatGPT that it
will explain your error in great detail as it already
does when I brought that up.
>
https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>

>
Righr, you LIED tl Chat GPT about it, and being an AI, it is dumb enough to believe it.
>
Note, I DID tell that to Chat GPT, and it agrees that DDD, when the criteria is what does DDD actually do, which is what the question MUST be about to be about the Termination or Halting problem, then DDD WILL HALT since HHH(DDD) will return 0 to it.
>
So, your claims are just proven to be lies.

>
Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on the behavior
of the directly executed DDD()?

>
Since you keep on LYING about what "terminating behavior" is, of course you keep getting the wrong answers.
>
All you are doing is proving that you are nothing but a pathological liar.
>

 I only gave it less than the same half page of basis
and it explained the details of your error very well
when it answered the above question:
 Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on
the behavior of the directly executed DDD()?
 https://chatgpt.com/share/67158ec6-3398-8011-98d1-41198baa29f2
 *You just do have the guts to see how wrong you are*