Re: ChatGPT 4.0 keeps refuting every rebuttal of my work ---

On 10/22/2024 2:07 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-21 13:44:01 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 10/21/2024 3:32 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2024-10-21 01:09:00 +0000, olcott said:
>

This is the recent dialogue that has been discussed
for a few days with exactly one more question added:
>
Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on the
behavior of the directly executed DDD()?
>
https://chatgpt.com/share/67158ec6-3398-8011-98d1-41198baa29f2
The first less than one page is the entire basis that
ChatGPT 4.0 uses to evaluate my work.

>
From the linked page: "This conversation may reflect the
link creator’s personalized data, which isn’t shared and
can meaningfully change how the model responds."
>
ChatGPT is not an authority on anything. If you can't make present
your argument then you can't argue. Opinions of an artificial idiot
are not interesting.

>
I dare you to find any mistake.
The less than half page that I teach it is all
correct C and correct software engineering.

 If you put a working draft on a web page then I may try. ChatGPT
is inherently uninteresting. Usenet messages are too temporary
for anything other than response messages.
 

USENET messages seems to be the most reliable permanent archive.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385090708_ChatGPT_Analyzes_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer
*I will update this periodically*
In the above version ChatGPT answers the following question:
Could it be correct for HHH(DDD) to report on the behavior of the directly executed DDD()?
Here is the link so you can argue with ChatGPT about this directly
https://chatgpt.com/share/67158ec6-3398-8011-98d1-41198baa29f2
I tested the most powerful Gemini and it failed.
I told it that it didn't do as well as ChatGPT and
it acknowledged that it is inferior to ChatGPT.
I think that ChatGPT is currently the most powerful LLM.
They are back to letting free users use version 4.0.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer