Sujet : Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 29. Oct 2024, 04:08:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfpjk2$1976k$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/28/2024 9:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 10/28/24 9:09 PM, olcott wrote:
On 10/28/2024 6:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>
It is IMPOSSIBLE to emulate DDD per the x86 semantics without the code for HHH, so it needs to be part of the input.
>
>
*You seemed to be a totally Jackass here*
You are not that stupid
You are not that ignorant
and this is not your ADD
>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d pop ebp
[00002183] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
At machine address 0000217a HHH emulates itself emulating
DDD without knowing that it is emulating itself.
>
Then how did it convert the call HHH into an emulation of DDD again?
When HHH (unknowingly) emulates itself emulating DDD this
emulated HHH is going to freaking emulate DDD.
Did you think it was going to play poker?
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…