Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 10/29/2024 3:44 AM, joes wrote:But it wasn't part of the the *INPUT* and thus your claim to be working with a description of the program is just proven to be a LIE.Am Mon, 28 Oct 2024 22:08:50 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 10/28/2024 9:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 10/28/24 9:09 PM, olcott wrote:When HHH (unknowingly) emulates itself emulating DDD this emulated HHHOn 10/28/2024 6:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:Then how did it convert the call HHH into an emulation of DDD again?>At machine address 0000217a HHH emulates itself emulating DDD without
It is IMPOSSIBLE to emulate DDD per the x86 semantics without the
code for HHH, so it needs to be part of the input.
knowing that it is emulating itself.
is going to freaking emulate DDD.Of course. For that it needs its own code. This doesn't need to beI have provided that at the type of page 21 for a long time now.
marked specially as being itself (HHH is not conscious), it just
needs to be identical to the running code.
>
https://www.liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD).pdf
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.