Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar?

On 11/7/2024 3:24 PM, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 07 Nov 2024 10:31:41 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 11/7/2024 5:56 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/6/24 11:39 PM, olcott wrote:

That is not what the machine code of DDD that calls the
machine code of HHH says.

The code by itself doesn’t say "do not return". That is a semantic
property.
 

The code itself does say that within the semantics
of the x86 language as I have been saying all long
hundreds of times.

Right, so that is part of the input, or it can't be emulated.
The Machine code of HHH says that it will abort its emulation
and return, so that is the only correct result per the x86
language.

Are you really so ignorant of these things that you think that
the fact that HHH returns to main() causes its emulated DDD to
reach its own final state?

Yes, because DDD calls HHH.
 

But the PROGRAM DDD, that it is emulating does. Just its own
PARTIAL emulation of it is aborted before it gets there.

Just repeating your errors, and not even trying to refute the
errors pointed out, I guess that means you accept these as
errors.

There is only one program DDD, although it is invoked multiple times.
We don’t care whether HHH actually simulates the return as long as
it actually derives (not guesses) the right result.
 

DDD emulated by HHH does have different behavior
than DDD emulated by HHH1 or directly executed DDD.
DDD emulated by CANNOT POSSIBLY HALT no matter WTF
HHH does: abort or NEVER abort.
Every idiot here is acting like the fact that Bill's
identical twin brother Fred (with no tattoo on his
right arm) did rob the liquor store on the basis that
there is a video of Bill robbing the liquor store that
shows Bill's tattoo.
If you have to study that 10,000 times to see the analogy
please do so and don't just spout off the first thing that
comes to mind.
There <is> a key distinguishing difference in the behavior
of DDD emulated by HHH and DDD emulated by HHH1 or directly
executed. It is ridiculously stupid to simply ignore this
for three f-cking years.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer