Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---x86 code is a liar?

On 11/8/24 9:43 AM, olcott wrote:

On 11/8/2024 4:22 AM, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 07 Nov 2024 21:56:59 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 11/7/2024 9:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/7/24 11:31 AM, olcott wrote:

>
DDD emulated by HHH has the property that DDD never reaches its
"return" instruction final halt state.

But DDD emulated by HHH isn't an objective property of DDD.

It <is> a semantic property of that finite string pair.

Pair, and not DDD alone.
>

 Because DDD was defined to interfere with HHH we cannot correctly
ignore this. DDD emulated by HHH never reaches its final halt state.
 

No, but we must handle the "interferance" per the definitions, which means what DDD ACTUALLY DOES including the effect of *THIS* HHH, not some other.
Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity and ignorance.