Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
Am Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:07:11 -0600 schrieb olcott:*IT WAS DISHONEST THAT YOU ERASED THIS PART*On 11/12/2024 9:46 AM, joes wrote:That is wrong. When you abort simulating, you can’t tell if it maybeAm Tue, 12 Nov 2024 08:49:55 -0600 schrieb olcott:On 11/12/2024 8:23 AM, joes wrote:Am Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:58:03 -0600 schrieb olcott:In no case does DDD emulated by any HHH that aborts at some point orOn 11/12/2024 1:12 AM, joes wrote:No. When the HHH that simulates DDD aborts, it also means that theAm Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:35:57 -0600 schrieb olcott:On 11/11/2024 10:25 AM, joes wrote:>Am Mon, 11 Nov 2024 08:58:02 -0600 schrieb olcott:On 11/11/2024 4:54 AM, Mikko wrote:On 2024-11-09 14:36:07 +0000, olcott said:On 11/9/2024 7:53 AM, Mikko wrote:DDD emulated by HHH does not reach its "return" instructionThe actual computation itself does involve HHH emulating itselfWhich is what you are doing: you pretend that DDD calls some
emulating DDD. To simply pretend that this does not occur seems
dishonest.
other HHH that doesn’t abort.
whether HHH aborts its emulation or not.
HHH that DDD calls aborts,
not does the emulated DDD ever reach its "return" instruction.
would have halted later on.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.