Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT

On 11/14/24 3:28 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/14/2024 2:22 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

joes <noreply@example.org> wrote:
>

What are weasel words?

>
Words whose precise meaning is difficult/impossible to pin down, and
deliberately so.  Politicians use these all the time.
>

 _DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
 DDD emulated by any HHH cannot possibly reach its "ret"
instruction final halt state.
  

But the emulation by HHH is NOT the DEFINITION of the behavior that HHH is suppoded to be reporting on.
That behavior that HHH is supposed to be reporting on is the behavior of the actual direct exectution of the program described by the input, or the COMPLETE emulation of the input, not the PARTIAL emulation done by HHH
THe program for both of these is the code of DDD paired with the EXACT HHH that is claimed to be giving the right answer, which is the HHH that aborts and returns.
You LIES are just that LIES, and show your stupidity that you seem to believe your own lies.