Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
Am Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:17:21 -0600 schrieb olcott:On 11/16/2024 8:26 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/16/24 9:09 AM, olcott wrote:On 11/16/2024 6:36 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/15/24 11:17 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/15/2024 10:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/15/24 10:57 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/15/2024 9:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/15/24 10:32 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/15/2024 9:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/15/24 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/14/2024 8:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/14/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/14/2024 2:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 11/14/24 3:28 PM, olcott wrote:On 11/14/2024 2:22 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:joes <noreply@example.org> wrote:That behavior that HHH is supposed to be reporting on is>
the behavior of the actual direct exectution of the program
described by the input,
IN OTHER WORDS YOU ARE SAYING THAT HHH SHOULD STUPIDLY
IGNORE THE FACT THAT DDD DOES SPECIFY THAT HHH MUST EMULATE
ITSELF EMULATING DDDI never called it a complete program and you swear your own allegianceWHich isn't a complete program, so a LIE to call it one.Your "Source Code", is NOT an axiom of the system.
>
to the father of lies by saying that I did.
I hereby swear allegiance to the father of lies.That may seem funny from an atheist POV unless and until
Which HHH does DDD call, the one that aborts?This has never made any damn difference.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.