Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT

On 11/16/2024 12:31 PM, joes wrote:

Am Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:18:33 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 11/16/2024 10:51 AM, joes wrote:

Am Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:17:21 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 11/16/2024 8:26 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/16/24 9:09 AM, olcott wrote:

On 11/16/2024 6:36 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/15/24 11:17 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/15/2024 10:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/15/24 10:57 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/15/2024 9:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/15/24 10:32 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/15/2024 9:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/15/24 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/14/2024 8:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/14/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/14/2024 2:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 11/14/24 3:28 PM, olcott wrote:

On 11/14/2024 2:22 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:

joes <noreply@example.org> wrote:

 

Which HHH does DDD call, the one that aborts?

This has never made any damn difference.

It absolutely does. If the inner HHH aborts, the outer doesn't need to,
because DDD halts.
 

That I have to keep telling you this seems to indicate that you are a
liar.

You don't need to. I am talking about the inner H called by D, not the
outermost H simulating D.
 

OK I GIVE UP YOU ARE JUST A DAMNED LIAR
YOU PROVED THAT BB ERASING RATHER THAN
RESPONDING TO MY MOST RELEVANT CONTEXT
The fact remains that DDD emulated by any HHH cannot
possibly reach its own "return" instruction final halt
state no matter WTF else IS THE CORRECT BASIS.
When an emulator emulates an infinite loop we do not
count this emulated infinite loop as halting when we
yank the power cord out.
HALTING IS ONLY REACHING A FINAL HALT STATE.
That I have to keep telling you this seems to
indicate that you are a liar.
*NOW YOU HAVE PROVED IT*
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer