Sujet : Re: The philosophy of computation reformulates existing ideas on a new basis ---SUCCINCT
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 16. Nov 2024, 22:19:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vhb28q$70ho$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/16/2024 3:08 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/16/24 1:57 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/16/2024 12:31 PM, joes wrote:
Am Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:18:33 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/16/2024 10:51 AM, joes wrote:
Am Sat, 16 Nov 2024 09:17:21 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/16/2024 8:26 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/16/24 9:09 AM, olcott wrote:
On 11/16/2024 6:36 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/15/24 11:17 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/15/2024 10:10 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/15/24 10:57 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/15/2024 9:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/15/24 10:32 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/15/2024 9:18 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/15/24 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/14/2024 8:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/14/24 9:38 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/14/2024 2:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/14/24 3:28 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/14/2024 2:22 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
joes <noreply@example.org> wrote:
>
Which HHH does DDD call, the one that aborts?
This has never made any damn difference.
It absolutely does. If the inner HHH aborts, the outer doesn't need to,
because DDD halts.
>
That I have to keep telling you this seems to indicate that you are a
liar.
You don't need to. I am talking about the inner H called by D, not the
outermost H simulating D.
>
>
OK I GIVE UP YOU ARE JUST A DAMNED LIAR
YOU PROVED THAT BB ERASING RATHER THAN
RESPONDING TO MY MOST RELEVANT CONTEXT
So, you agree that YOUR erasing of context from my replies just makes you a DAMNED LIAR
>
The fact remains that DDD emulated by any HHH cannot
possibly reach its own "return" instruction final halt
state no matter WTF else IS THE CORRECT BASIS.
No, the CORRECT BASIS is the basis DEFINED for the Halting Problem,
By this same reasoning the correct basis for Russell's
Paradox is naive set theory and ZFC is stupidly wrong
to think otherwise, nitwit.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…