Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 2/9/2025 4:08 AM, Mikko wrote:That is not the context of OP.On 2025-02-08 14:55:09 +0000, olcott said:Within the context that HHH <is> a simulating termination
On 2/8/2025 4:25 AM, Mikko wrote:Your request does not make sense. Non-existence of a exclusion does notOn 2025-02-07 23:13:04 +0000, olcott said:Show the execution trace of that.
Experts in the C programming language will know that DDWrong, they understand that nothing below exludes the possibility that
correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own
"if" statement.
HHH is a program that can correctly simulate DD to its "if" statement.
have an execution trace.
No, it does not. I only requires that the execution of HHH with a functionThe code of HHH might exlude that but that is not sohwn below.>> int Halt_Status = HHH(DD); // line 3 of DD
The finite string DD specifies non-terminating recursiveNo, it does not. DD as quoted below pecifies nothing about the behaviour
simulation to simulating termination analyzer HHH.
of HHH, only its argument types and return type.
Requires HHH to simulate itself simulating DD recursively.
pointer to DD must be started. OP does not show what happens next.
analyzer line 3 of DD proves that DD cannot possibly reach
its own "if" statement.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.