Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 10. Feb 2025, 13:59:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <e927b5c876314add491c7e50071156e92ef307e7@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:27:33 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 2/10/2025 6:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 10.feb.2025 om 12:51 schreef olcott:
On 2/10/2025 2:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 09.feb.2025 om 20:54 schreef olcott:
On 2/9/2025 1:33 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 09.feb.2025 om 20:04 schreef olcott:
On 2/9/2025 12:54 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 09.feb.2025 om 18:00 schreef olcott:
On 2/9/2025 10:50 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 09.feb.2025 om 16:18 schreef olcott:
On 2/9/2025 2:13 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 09.feb.2025 om 07:10 schreef olcott:
On 2/8/2025 3:54 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 08.feb.2025 om 15:47 schreef olcott:
On 2/8/2025 3:57 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
Op 08.feb.2025 om 06:53 schreef olcott:
On 2/7/2025 7:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/7/25 8:12 PM, olcott wrote:
On 2/7/2025 5:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/7/25 11:26 AM, olcott wrote:
On 2/7/2025 6:20 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/6/25 10:02 PM, olcott wrote:
On 2/6/2025 8:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/6/25 5:18 PM, olcott wrote:
On 2/6/2025 1:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 2/6/25 1:26 PM, olcott wrote:
On 2/6/2025 10:52 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 05.02.2025 um 16:11 schrieb olcott:
On 2/5/2025 1:44 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
Am 05.02.2025 um 04:38 schrieb olcott:

It is a verified fact that main cannot possibly be correctly
simulated by HHH until its normal termination.
Indeed, which proves that HHH is unable to simulate itself
correctly.
If this was true then you could point out exactly where HHH is
incorrect.
Line 502.

It is true as a verified fact and has been pointed out to Olcott many
times, but he refuses to learn. So, again:
It is a verified fact that main halts,
It is a verified fact that the input to HHH(main) cannot possibly
terminate normally.
No, the verified fact is that the input can terminatie normally
The directly executed main IS NOT THE INPUT TO HHH.
It’s not? What if it were?

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Feb 25 * A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node172olcott
5 Feb 25 `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node171Bonita Montero
5 Feb 25  `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node170olcott
6 Feb 25   `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node169Bonita Montero
6 Feb 25    `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node168olcott
6 Feb 25     +- Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node1Bonita Montero
6 Feb 25     `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node166Richard Damon
6 Feb 25      `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node165olcott
7 Feb 25       `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node164Richard Damon
7 Feb 25        `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node163olcott
7 Feb 25         `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node162Richard Damon
7 Feb 25          `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node161olcott
8 Feb 25           `* Re: A third line of cancer treatment reversed the growth of the right paracaval lymph node160Richard Damon
8 Feb 25            `* Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH159olcott
8 Feb 25             `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH158Richard Damon
8 Feb 25              `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH157olcott
8 Feb 25               +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH146Fred. Zwarts
8 Feb 25               i+- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Alan Mackenzie
8 Feb 25               i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH144olcott
8 Feb 25               i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH142Fred. Zwarts
9 Feb 25               i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH141olcott
9 Feb 25               i i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH137Fred. Zwarts
9 Feb 25               i i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH136olcott
9 Feb 25               i i i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH135Fred. Zwarts
9 Feb 25               i i i  `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH134olcott
9 Feb 25               i i i   +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
9 Feb 25               i i i   `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH132Fred. Zwarts
9 Feb 25               i i i    `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH131olcott
9 Feb 25               i i i     `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH130Fred. Zwarts
9 Feb 25               i i i      `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH129olcott
10 Feb 25               i i i       +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
10 Feb 25               i i i       +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH35Fred. Zwarts
10 Feb 25               i i i       i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH34olcott
10 Feb 25               i i i       i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH29Fred. Zwarts
10 Feb 25               i i i       i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH28olcott
10 Feb 25               i i i       i i +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
10 Feb 25               i i i       i i +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1joes
10 Feb 25               i i i       i i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH25Fred. Zwarts
10 Feb 25               i i i       i i  `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH24olcott
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i   +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i   +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH18joes
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH17olcott
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH15Fred. Zwarts
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH14olcott
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH12Fred. Zwarts
13 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH11olcott
13 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH9Fred. Zwarts
14 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH8olcott
14 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH7Richard Damon
14 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i i  `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH6olcott
14 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i i   +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH4joes
15 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i i   i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH3olcott
15 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i i   i +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
15 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i i   i `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Fred. Zwarts
14 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i i   `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
13 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i i `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
12 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i i `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
12 Feb 25               i i i       i i   i `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i   `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH4Fred. Zwarts
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i    `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH3olcott
11 Feb 25               i i i       i i     +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Fred. Zwarts
12 Feb 25               i i i       i i     `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
10 Feb 25               i i i       i +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
10 Feb 25               i i i       i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH3joes
10 Feb 25               i i i       i  `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH2olcott
11 Feb 25               i i i       i   `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
10 Feb 25               i i i       `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH92joes
10 Feb 25               i i i        `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH91olcott
10 Feb 25               i i i         +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH3Richard Damon
10 Feb 25               i i i         i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH2olcott
11 Feb 25               i i i         i `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
10 Feb 25               i i i         `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH87joes
10 Feb 25               i i i          `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH86olcott
10 Feb 25               i i i           +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH84joes
10 Feb 25               i i i           i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH83olcott
11 Feb 25               i i i           i +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
11 Feb 25               i i i           i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH81joes
11 Feb 25               i i i           i  `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH80olcott
11 Feb 25               i i i           i   +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH78joes
13 Feb 25               i i i           i   i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH77olcott
13 Feb 25               i i i           i   i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH75joes
13 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH74olcott
13 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH72Fred. Zwarts
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH71olcott
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH21joes
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH20olcott
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH7joes
15 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i i`* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH6olcott
15 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i i +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
15 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH4Fred. Zwarts
16 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i i  `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH3olcott
16 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i i   +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Fred. Zwarts
16 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i i   `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i +- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH11Fred. Zwarts
15 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i  +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH3olcott
15 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i  i+- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
15 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i  i`- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Fred. Zwarts
16 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i  `* DIFFERENT LEVELS OF RECURSION --- DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH7olcott
16 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i   +* Re: DIFFERENT LEVELS OF RECURSION --- DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH5Fred. Zwarts
16 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i i   `- Re: DIFFERENT LEVELS OF RECURSION --- DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH48Fred. Zwarts
14 Feb 25               i i i           i   i i `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
13 Feb 25               i i i           i   i `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
12 Feb 25               i i i           i   `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
11 Feb 25               i i i           `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
9 Feb 25               i i `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH3Richard Damon
8 Feb 25               i `- Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH1Richard Damon
8 Feb 25               +* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH7Richard Damon
8 Feb 25               `* Re: Sufficient knowledge of C proves that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH3Richard Damon

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal