Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

Am Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:21:59 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 2/13/2025 9:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/13/25 7:07 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:

On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>

Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that
article before or when HHH

>
That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been
talking about in this forum for several years.

>
Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about that
paper.
>
Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line
contains a false claim.

>
It is a truism and not one person on the face of the Earth can
possibly show otherwise.

>
The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a truism.
In order to determine the claim is false one needs some knowledge
that is not obvious.
>

When you try to show the steps attempting to show that it is false I
will point out the error.

>
We havm, but you are too stupid to understand it.
Since when DD run, it halts,

>
THAT IS A DIFFERENT INSTANCE

 Why are you passing the wrong input to HHH?