Re: DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH --- COMPLETE PROOF

On 2/15/25 8:13 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/15/2025 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-14 12:40:04 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 2/14/2025 2:58 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-14 00:07:23 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 2/13/2025 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-13 04:21:34 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 2/12/2025 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-02-11 14:41:38 +0000, olcott said:
>

Of course not. However, the fact that no reference to that article
before or when HHH

>
That paper and its code are the only thing that I have been talking about in this forum for several years.

>
Doesn't matter when you don't say that you are talking about that paper.
>
Anyway, that is irrelevant to the fact that the subject line contains
a false claim.

>
It is a truism and not one person on the face of the
Earth can possibly show otherwise.

>
The fact that the claim on subject line is false is not a truism.
In order to determine the claim is false one needs some knowledge
that is not obvious.

>
When you try to show the steps attempting to show that
it is false I will point out the error.

>
Step 1: Find people who know C.
Step 2: Show them DD of OP and ask.
>

This is the only topic that I will discuss and any

>
typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
>
int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
int main()
{
   HHH(DD);
}
>
DD  correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally.

>
That claim has already shown to be false. Nothing above shows that
HHH does not return 0. If it does DD also returns 0.
>

 *You (and everyone else) is proven wrong by the following*
 918-1156  // All of the lines of termination analyzer HHH
1355-1370 // DD() through main()

Which are not part of the above, and thus not part of the input, or what you call "DD".
Sorry, you just don't understand the RULES for a program.

 https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
 The assembly language source code of every function in Halt7.c
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7out.txt
 This shows the complete execution trace of
(a) main
(b) DD
 It does not show the 171 pages of execution trace of HHH.
This can be much more easily verified by the provided
239 lines of source code: 918-1156
 Although the code for HHH is very difficult to understand
(Only Mike has ever really tried to understand it)
At least now it is all in one single contiguous block.
 The x86utm operating system functions that it calls
are found here:
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/x86utm.cpp
 https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/include/Read_COFF_Object.h
 

Which all just proves that you are lying about what you claim, likely because you are too stupid to understand what you mean, but just recklessly disregard the truth that has been pointed out to you.
Pulling in things, while at the same time excluding them is just proof that you are just a lying fraud.