Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 2/20/2025 4:38 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:We aren't doing a "dodge", but pointing out the fundamental error in your statement.olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:As soon as people fully address rather than endlessly dodgeOn 2/20/2025 2:38 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2025-02-20 00:31:33 +0000, olcott said:
[ .... ]
>>I have given everyone here all of the complete source code for a few
years>True but irrelevant. OP did not specify that HHH means that particular
code.
>Every post that I have been talking about for two or>
more years has referred to variations of that same code.
Yes. It would be a relief if you could move on to posting something new
and fresh.
>
my key points I will be done.
Let's start with a root point.Nope, since DD halts.
All of the other points validate this root point.
*Simulating termination analyzer HHH correctly determines*
*the non-halt status of DD*
*According to the UTPTO patent law practice I am incorporating*And thus you admit that there is only one HHH in existance, and that incorrectly simulated its input of DD, since it aborts it,
*the following paper and source-code by reference*
https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s217.html
Simulating Termination Analyzer H is Not Fooled by Pathological Input DWhich just repeats your error
https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/369971402_Simulating_Termination_Analyzer_H_is_Not_Fooled_by_Pathological_Input_D
918-1156 // All of the lines of termination analyzer HHHWhich thuys say that HHH is, on only is that code, that WILL abort its emulaiton of DD, and thus the phrase "unless HHH aborts" is a lie, since HHH can only abort, and thus an HHH that doesn't abort can not be in view except by lying.
1355-1370 // DD() through main()
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
-- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius>
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.