Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 2025-02-24 23:28:30 +0000, olcott said:Please provide the reasoning for that stupid nonsense
On 2/24/2025 2:41 AM, Mikko wrote:Because what you have presented as "proof" are based on claims thatOn 2025-02-23 17:35:46 +0000, olcott said:>
>On 2/23/2025 4:46 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2025-02-22 16:43:24 +0000, olcott said:>
>My proof is very important because it provides the key>
basis for a chat bot that can spot and perfectly refute
lies in real time. This could save the planet and save
Democracy.
Unlikely to work if you let the chat bot to assume or infer
that false <-> true.
When its knowledge is correctly encoded it would never make
that stupid mistake.
If you build the bot from a proof that implies that true <-> false
THEN YOU ARE ENCODING IT INCORRECTLY.
TRUE ↔ FALSE is stupidly wrong.
Why are you suggesting something that is stupidly wrong?
are sufficient for the proof of true <-> false.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.