Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

On 2/26/25 11:40 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:

On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>

You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation being
incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation sequence
long ago.

>

What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?

The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, the
'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction,

What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.

 

There can be no correct continuation.
>

 I say what the correct simulation is.

No, you say what you think a correct simulation is, but it breaks the rules of a correct simulation, thus it isn't correct.

You say that I am wrong.
 

Because you are.

If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist.
You can't say what this is only because I have always been correct.
 

Yes, but HHH doesn't need to be able to do it, since it doesn't.
HHH1 does a correct simulation of the input, and gives the right answer.
The fact that HHH doesn't do that shows it is incorrect, and you are just a stupid liar.
Your logic is just filled with false and impossible premises, which have taken all your intelegence away.