Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code
De : wyniijj5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (wij)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 01. Mar 2025, 03:07:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <e608a71d7e0c47e6b1fda5ecfceb66b845a70788.camel@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41)
On Fri, 2025-02-28 at 20:05 -0600, olcott wrote:
On 2/28/2025 7:00 PM, dbush wrote:
On 2/28/2025 7:47 PM, olcott wrote:
_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
 
When we hypothesize that the code at machine address
0000213c is an x86 emulator then we know that DD
remains stuck in recursive emulation and cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
 
When we add the additional complexity that HHH also
aborts this sequence at some point then every level
of recursive emulation immediately stops. This does
not enable any DD to ever reach its "ret" instruction.
 
 
Likewise:
 
0000000000400534 <no_numbers_greater_than_10>:
   400534:    55                       push   rbp
   400535:    48 89 e5                 mov    rbp,rsp
   400538:    b8 34 05 40 00           mov    eax,0x400534 ; push
no_numbers_greater_than_10
   40053d:    48 89 c7                 mov    rdi,rax
   400540:    e8 a8 ff ff ff           call   4004ed <F>   ; call F
   400545:    5d                       pop    rbp
   400546:    c3                       ret
 
When we hypothesize that the code at machine address
4004ed is an x86 emulator then we know that no_numbers_greater_than_10
remains stuck in recursive emulation and cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
 
When we add the additional complexity that F also
aborts this sequence at some point then every level
of recursive emulation immediately stops. This does
not enable any no_numbers_greater_than_10 to ever reach its "ret"
instruction.
 
 
So you and your code agrees with me.

Your god reads your true wishes.
Surrender to my GUR, you might be saved from the Lake Of Fire (plus stoned),
which is only the second death, cancer is merely the first.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Mar 25 * DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code96olcott
1 Mar 25 +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code8dbush
1 Mar 25 i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code7olcott
1 Mar 25 i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1wij
1 Mar 25 i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code4dbush
1 Mar 25 i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3olcott
1 Mar 25 i i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1dbush
1 Mar 25 i i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1dbush
1 Mar 25 i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1dbush
1 Mar 25 +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code52Mikko
2 Mar 25 i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code51olcott
2 Mar 25 i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code41dbush
2 Mar 25 i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code40olcott
2 Mar 25 i i `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code39dbush
2 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code38olcott
2 Mar 25 i i   `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code37dbush
2 Mar 25 i i    `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code36olcott
2 Mar 25 i i     +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1dbush
2 Mar 25 i i     `* Copyright34joes
2 Mar 25 i i      `* Re: Copyright33Mikko
2 Mar 25 i i       `* Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years32olcott
2 Mar 25 i i        +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years14Richard Heathfield
2 Mar 25 i i        i`* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years13olcott
2 Mar 25 i i        i +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years11Andy Walker
2 Mar 25 i i        i i`* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct10olcott
2 Mar 25 i i        i i +- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct1Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i i `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct8Andy Walker
3 Mar 25 i i        i i  `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct7olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i   `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct6Fred. Zwarts
3 Mar 25 i i        i i    `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct5olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i     +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct2joes
3 Mar 25 i i        i i     i`- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct1olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i     +- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct1Fred. Zwarts
4 Mar 25 i i        i i     `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25 i i        i `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years14Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i`* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years13olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years9Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i i`* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years8olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years7Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i i  +* Far less than no rebuttal at all5olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i  i+* Re: Far less than no rebuttal at all3Fred. Zwarts
3 Mar 25 i i        i i  ii`* Re: Far less than no rebuttal at all2olcott
4 Mar 25 i i        i i  ii `- Re: Far less than no rebuttal at all1Fred. Zwarts
4 Mar 25 i i        i i  i`- Re: Far less than no rebuttal at all1Richard Damon
4 Mar 25 i i        i i  `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years3Fred. Zwarts
3 Mar 25 i i        i  `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years2olcott
4 Mar 25 i i        i   `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years3Mikko
3 Mar 25 i i         `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years2olcott
4 Mar 25 i i          `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1Mikko
2 Mar 25 i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code5Richard Damon
2 Mar 25 i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code4olcott
2 Mar 25 i i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
2 Mar 25 i i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Mikko
2 Mar 25 i i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25 i `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code4Mikko
2 Mar 25 i  `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3olcott
2 Mar 25 i   +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1wij
3 Mar 25 i   `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
1 Mar 25 +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25 `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code34Richard Damon
1 Mar 25  `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code33olcott
1 Mar 25   +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code15Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25   i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code14olcott
1 Mar 25   i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code12Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25   i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code11olcott
1 Mar 25   i i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3Fred. Zwarts
2 Mar 25   i i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code2olcott
2 Mar 25   i i i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
1 Mar 25   i i `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code7Fred. Zwarts
2 Mar 25   i i  `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code6olcott
2 Mar 25   i i   +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3Richard Damon
2 Mar 25   i i   i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code2olcott
2 Mar 25   i i   i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25   i i   +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
2 Mar 25   i i   `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25   i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
1 Mar 25   `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code17Richard Damon
1 Mar 25    `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code16olcott
1 Mar 25     +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code8Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25     i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code7olcott
1 Mar 25     i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
1 Mar 25     i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code4Fred. Zwarts
2 Mar 25     i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3olcott
2 Mar 25     i i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25     i i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
2 Mar 25     i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
1 Mar 25     `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code7Richard Damon
2 Mar 25      `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code6olcott
2 Mar 25       +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3Richard Damon
2 Mar 25       i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code2olcott
2 Mar 25       i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25       +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
2 Mar 25       `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal