Re: Anyone with sufficient knowledge of C knows that DD specifies non-terminating behavior to HHH

On 2/28/25 8:56 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/28/2025 8:30 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/27/25 11:20 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/27/2025 7:00 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 2/27/25 2:06 PM, olcott wrote:

On 2/27/2025 3:36 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 27.feb.2025 om 05:40 schreef olcott:

On 2/26/2025 9:52 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 26 Feb 2025 08:49:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 2/26/2025 3:48 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 26.feb.2025 om 05:50 schreef olcott:

On 2/25/2025 10:21 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

>

You already know that you are stupidly wrong about the emulation being
incorrect or you would have provided the correct emulation sequence
long ago.

>

What are the first 15 lines of DD correctly emulated by HHH?

The error in the simulation occurs already at the 5th instruction, the
'call 000015c3'. Instead of simulating this instruction,

What are the correct first 15 lines of DD emulated by HHH.

>

There can be no correct continuation.
>

>
I say what the correct simulation is.
You say that I am wrong.
>
If I am wrong then a correct simulation must exist.

>
HHH1 did a correct simulation, so, there it is.
>

>
That dishonestly dodged the original question:
What are the first 15 *lines of DD* correctly emulated by HHH?
>
_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>
>

>
PROBLEM BLOWS UP as the value of memory 000015c3 isn't specified as part

>
When you are told that this address specifies an
x86 emulator then disagreement is incorrect.
>

Isw ee are told it has a x86 emulatolr,

 See this post
DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code
 

Yea, pointed out your errors there.
Until you show where I make an error, you are just proven to be a blantant liar, that doesn't care about the truth.