Sujet : Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 02. Mar 2025, 17:22:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <e7868f47c94b8edcc6fcf2b224e8ac5ea8a2fa7c@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 09:51:56 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 3/2/2025 8:55 AM, joes wrote:
Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 08:42:03 -0600 schrieb olcott:
I challenged everyone here to provide the machine address by machine
address (AKA line by line) execution trace of DD correctly emulated by
HHH that reaches its own "ret" instruction.
No one made any attempt to do this because they know that this would
prove that they are stupidly wrong to say that my trace is incorrect.
I did, on thursday at 9pm UTC.
I am asking for a sequence of 10 hexadecimal integer machine addresses
of DD correctly emulated by HHH.
See that post.
At machine address 0000213c HHH emulates itself emulating DD.
Yeah, it simulates HHH, not DD.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.
Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong
Re: Failure to meet this challenge proves that all of my reviewers are wrong