Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 02. Mar 2025, 18:17:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vq23r8$s54f$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 02/03/2025 14:18, olcott wrote:
On 3/2/2025 3:44 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-03-02 07:45:26 +0000, joes said:
>
Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 02:28:14 +0000 schrieb Mr Flibble:
Stop stealing my idea: it is Copyright 2022 Mr Flibble.
May I note that useless or wrong ideas are not patentable.
>
No patent was claimed, only copyright. But copyright does not protect ideas,
only particular presentations of those ideas, to some extent.
>
 For example the term "simulating halt decider" and
"simulating termination analyzer" have been copyrighted
by me for many years.
No, they haven't. Copyright protects creative work, not word salad.

I do this to establish academic
credit for these underlying ideas.
If you want to do that, write a paper and copyright /that/.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Mar 25 * DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code96olcott
1 Mar 25 +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code8dbush
1 Mar 25 i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code7olcott
1 Mar 25 i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1wij
1 Mar 25 i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code4dbush
1 Mar 25 i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3olcott
1 Mar 25 i i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1dbush
1 Mar 25 i i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1dbush
1 Mar 25 i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1dbush
1 Mar 25 +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code52Mikko
2 Mar 25 i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code51olcott
2 Mar 25 i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code41dbush
2 Mar 25 i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code40olcott
2 Mar 25 i i `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code39dbush
2 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code38olcott
2 Mar 25 i i   `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code37dbush
2 Mar 25 i i    `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code36olcott
2 Mar 25 i i     +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1dbush
2 Mar 25 i i     `* Copyright34joes
2 Mar 25 i i      `* Re: Copyright33Mikko
2 Mar 25 i i       `* Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years32olcott
2 Mar 25 i i        +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years14Richard Heathfield
2 Mar 25 i i        i`* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years13olcott
2 Mar 25 i i        i +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years11Andy Walker
2 Mar 25 i i        i i`* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct10olcott
2 Mar 25 i i        i i +- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct1Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i i `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct8Andy Walker
3 Mar 25 i i        i i  `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct7olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i   `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct6Fred. Zwarts
3 Mar 25 i i        i i    `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct5olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i     +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct2joes
3 Mar 25 i i        i i     i`- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct1olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i     +- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct1Fred. Zwarts
4 Mar 25 i i        i i     `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years --- proves itself correct1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25 i i        i `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years14Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i`* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years13olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i +* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years9Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i i`* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years8olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years7Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i i  +* Far less than no rebuttal at all5olcott
3 Mar 25 i i        i i  i+* Re: Far less than no rebuttal at all3Fred. Zwarts
3 Mar 25 i i        i i  ii`* Re: Far less than no rebuttal at all2olcott
4 Mar 25 i i        i i  ii `- Re: Far less than no rebuttal at all1Fred. Zwarts
4 Mar 25 i i        i i  i`- Re: Far less than no rebuttal at all1Richard Damon
4 Mar 25 i i        i i  `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        i `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years3Fred. Zwarts
3 Mar 25 i i        i  `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years2olcott
4 Mar 25 i i        i   `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1Richard Damon
3 Mar 25 i i        `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years3Mikko
3 Mar 25 i i         `* Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years2olcott
4 Mar 25 i i          `- Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years1Mikko
2 Mar 25 i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code5Richard Damon
2 Mar 25 i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code4olcott
2 Mar 25 i i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
2 Mar 25 i i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Mikko
2 Mar 25 i i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25 i `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code4Mikko
2 Mar 25 i  `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3olcott
2 Mar 25 i   +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1wij
3 Mar 25 i   `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
1 Mar 25 +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25 `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code34Richard Damon
1 Mar 25  `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code33olcott
1 Mar 25   +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code15Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25   i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code14olcott
1 Mar 25   i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code12Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25   i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code11olcott
1 Mar 25   i i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3Fred. Zwarts
2 Mar 25   i i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code2olcott
2 Mar 25   i i i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
1 Mar 25   i i `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code7Fred. Zwarts
2 Mar 25   i i  `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code6olcott
2 Mar 25   i i   +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3Richard Damon
2 Mar 25   i i   i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code2olcott
2 Mar 25   i i   i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25   i i   +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
2 Mar 25   i i   `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25   i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
1 Mar 25   `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code17Richard Damon
1 Mar 25    `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code16olcott
1 Mar 25     +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code8Fred. Zwarts
1 Mar 25     i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code7olcott
1 Mar 25     i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
1 Mar 25     i +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code4Fred. Zwarts
2 Mar 25     i i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3olcott
2 Mar 25     i i +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25     i i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
2 Mar 25     i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
1 Mar 25     `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code7Richard Damon
2 Mar 25      `* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code6olcott
2 Mar 25       +* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code3Richard Damon
2 Mar 25       i`* Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code2olcott
2 Mar 25       i `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Richard Damon
2 Mar 25       +- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1joes
2 Mar 25       `- Re: DD emulated by HHH cannot possibly terminate normally --- x86 code1Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal