Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
Op 03.mrt.2025 om 03:59 schreef olcott:It utterly refutes anyone else that claims to have createdOn 3/2/2025 6:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote:Ha ha ha. As if not being found by Google proves something.On 3/2/25 9:18 AM, olcott wrote:>On 3/2/2025 3:44 AM, Mikko wrote:>On 2025-03-02 07:45:26 +0000, joes said:>
>Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 02:28:14 +0000 schrieb Mr Flibble:>Stop stealing my idea: it is Copyright 2022 Mr Flibble.May I note that useless or wrong ideas are not patentable.
No patent was claimed, only copyright. But copyright does not protect ideas,
only particular presentations of those ideas, to some extent.
>
For example the term "simulating halt decider" and
"simulating termination analyzer" have been copyrighted
by me for many years. I do this to establish academic
credit for these underlying ideas.
>
Can't be, You can't "Copyright" words, only creative works.
>
Your papers on the topic can be, but not the terms.
>
Terms can be protected under "Trademark", but that has a cost to register, and also you have to show a comercial purpose, and can't be just an ordinary term of art that describes your thing.
>
So, if you paid a lawyer to actually copyright the terms, you wasted money and got had. Just like if some lawyer suggested that you could get a copyright on such a term.
>
>
That every reference to the term "simulating halt decider"
in a Google search pulls up pages and pages of me establishes
that I am the creator of the notion of a "simulating halt decider"
My great great great great great grandfather cannot be found by Google, so he never existed. Ha ha ha. My first ancestor that is found by Google must have been a special creation. Ha ha ha.My Great Granfather's oldest brother Henry Steele Olcott
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.