Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years

On 2025-03-03 19:40:53 +0000, olcott said:

On 3/3/2025 6:51 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-03-02 14:18:35 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 3/2/2025 3:44 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-03-02 07:45:26 +0000, joes said:
 

Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 02:28:14 +0000 schrieb Mr Flibble:

Stop stealing my idea: it is Copyright 2022 Mr Flibble.

May I note that useless or wrong ideas are not patentable.

 No patent was claimed, only copyright. But copyright does not protect ideas,
only particular presentations of those ideas, to some extent.
 

 For example the term "simulating halt decider" and
"simulating termination analyzer" have been copyrighted
by me for many years. I do this to establish academic
credit for these underlying ideas.

 Academic credit is not connected to copyrights. Submission and
publication dates have some significance. Most important are
references by others.

 The copyright notice indicates that one is not
merely referring to the work of others.

No, it does not. I have seen copyright notices and references to work of
others in the same opus.
--
Mikko