Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 17:11 schreef olcott:

On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:

On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.

I wonder why Olcott keeps repeating that HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction, where the direct execution or world-class simulators have no problem to reach the 'ret' instruction of exactly the same finite string as input.

>
The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
own "ret" instruction.
>

And that is exactly what Olcott does not show.

 Likewise I never attempt to show exactly how
all squares are round.

But it is very similar.

 

So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction, where the direct execution and some world-class simulators have no problem to reach it.

 DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HHH1.
DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.
 Assuming that the pathological relationship between HHH
and DD has no effect on the behavior of DD when it is
easily proven that it does IS STUPID.

It has no effect on the behaviour of DD, but on the behaviour of the simulator. HHH fails, where others succeed to reach the 'ret' instruction. HHH cannot possibly reach the 'ret' instruction and Olcott knows about this failure, because he keeps repeating it.