Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

On 3/5/2025 5:51 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/5/2025 3:39 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/5/2025 4:37 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/5/2025 3:03 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/5/2025 3:55 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/5/2025 10:14 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott:

On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:

On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:

On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:

On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts
wrote:

Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef
olcott:

>

So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach
the 'ret' instruction, where the direct
execution and some world-class simulators have no problem to reach it.

DD calls its own emulator when emulated by
HHH. DD DOES NOT call its own emulator
when emulated by HHH1. DD DOES NOT call
its own emulator when directly executed.

Which just show your stupidity, as DD
doesn't HAVE its own emulator, and CAN'T
know who or if it is being emulated.

It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly
using the straw-man deception to change the
subject away from: DD correctly emulated by
HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.

WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid
to recogines.

I will show that it is not straw-man after you
quit dodging that point.

Wrong order,

I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER

In other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, even
though logically requried, because you need to hide your
fraud.

My proof requires a specific  prerequisite order. One
cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to
ten. DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally. Is the
first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof

What is the next step?
>

>
*DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach* *its own
"ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>
It has taken two years to create this first step such that it is the the simplest way to state the key element of the whole
proof and make this element impossible to correctly refute.
>
EVERY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS POINT IS
DISHONEST.
>

>
Before agreeing on an answer, it is first required to agree on
the question.

>
*DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach* *its own
"ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>
This is irrefutable. Every attempt to show otherwise has been a
change of subject.
>
Until we have mutual agreement on that key most important point
upon which all other points depend this point will be repeated.
>

>
So if you say "there's a black cat in the kitchen" and I want to
know if there's a white dog in my living room, how is that in any
way useful?

>
In other words

 You'll be disappointed when you realize what you've been working on is the wrong thing.