Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

On 3/8/2025 11:07 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/8/2025 9:59 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/8/2025 10:53 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/8/2025 9:49 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/8/2025 10:43 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/8/2025 9:35 PM, dbush wrote:

>
Your copy-paste answer to multiple threads indicates you have no real rebuttal for what others have said.
>

>
*This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed*
>
  <copy-paste response>
>

>
>
In other words, you have no rebuttal.

>
*This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed*
>
*UNTIL YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THIS YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY UNDERSTAND*
*THE NEXT STEP THAT ADDRESSES ALL OF THE OTHER ISSUES*
>
<copy-paste response>
>
>

>
Doesn't matter, as you've already accepted that your HHH isn't a solution to the halting problem

 *I never said that*
I said that fully understanding my first
step is required to understand any other
aspects such as the details of application
to the halting problem.

There *is* no application if it doesn't meet the requirements.

 You insist on me teaching you algebra
before you learn arithmetic.

No, you insist on agreeing on an answer before agreeing on a question.
You're basically insisting that we agree that there's a black cat in your kitchen when we want to know if there's a white dog in your living room.
It doesn't matter what your HHH is mapping if it doesn't meet the requirements to be a solution to the halting problem.

 Feel free to endlessly spin in head games
and all you get from is cut-and-paste.
 

That my explanations are over your head does not make them head games.