Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

On 3/9/2025 4:05 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 08.mrt.2025 om 18:47 schreef olcott:

On 3/8/2025 9:41 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:

Op 08.mrt.2025 om 15:09 schreef olcott:

On 3/8/2025 3:06 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-03-07 15:11:53 +0000, olcott said:
>

_DD()
[00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
[00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
[00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
[0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
[00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
[00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
[00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
[0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
[0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
[00002154] 5d         pop ebp
[00002155] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.

>
The source code 100% perfectly proves exactly what it
actually does.

Yes, even if there are error in the program, it does what it does.

>
There is no error.
>

 That is a claim, not a proof. Many errors have been pointed out, but the program was not corrected. Without a proof of correctness, a program does not prove anything.

All the reported "errors" are only your failure  to understand the code.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer