Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---

On 2025-03-10 13:46:43 +0000, olcott said:

On 3/10/2025 3:59 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-03-09 13:16:20 +0000, olcott said:>>

When we assume that HHH emulates N steps of DD then

 HHH does not present that assumption, which is therefore irrelevant
to the fact that https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
does not prove anything.

 typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);
 int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
 int main()
{
   HHH(DD);
}
 DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "retrun" instruction and terminate normally
because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.

That is not written on https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
so not relevant.

Perhaps you are not a competent programmer.

Millions of people use or have used devices that contain programs I have
made or improved.
--
Mikko