Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows

On 11/03/2025 17:07, olcott wrote:
<snip>

You still sound like Richard Damon whom is unable to
understand that semantic tautologies are irrefutable.

Jolly good. You're right because you say so. Got it.
Heads up: claiming that you're right because you're right doesn't make your claim irrefutable; it just makes it pointless to reason with you.

When N steps of the above the above functions are
correctly emulated by HHH
(this is all that you need to know able HHH) then
none of them reach their "return" instruction and
terminate normally.
 HHH can and does emulate itself emulating DDD and DD.

It doesn't compile here, so it can't, but it does anyway because you're right, right? And round and round you go...
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within