Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 2025-03-11 13:26:55 +0000, olcott said:It need not those are totally
On 3/11/2025 5:01 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:The stipulation does not include the value of N (although a reasonableOn 11/03/2025 08:55, Fred. Zwarts wrote:>Op 11.mrt.2025 om 00:41 schreef olcott:>typedef void (*ptr)();>
int HHH(ptr P);
>
void Infinite_Loop()
{
HERE: goto HERE;
return;
}
>
void Infinite_Recursion()
{
Infinite_Recursion();
return;
}
>
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
int DD()
{
int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
if (Halt_Status)
HERE: goto HERE;
return Halt_Status;
}
>
That when HHH correctly emulates N steps of the
above functions that none of these functions can
possibly reach their own "return" instruction
and terminate normally.>>
Since HHH does see that same pattern that competent
C programmers see it correctly aborts its emulation
and rejects these inputs as non terminating.
All competent C programmers see that HHH correctly reports that it cannot possibly reach the 'return' instruction.
First, my credentials. I've been programming in C for over 35 years; I'm told that my book on C has been used on two undergraduate Comp Sci courses (one in the States and one in the UK); and I have my Knuth cheque. I don't claim to be any kind of programming guru, but I hope I do not overstate the case when I suggest that I can be regarded as competent not just as a programmer but specifically in the C language.
>
And yet I can't even /see/ HHH, let alone judge what it does or does not do correctly. All I see is a call to it.
It is stipulated that HHH correctly emulates N
steps of the x86 machine code of its input functions.
This may or may not include HHH emulating itself
emulating an input.
interpretation is that it is finite). Nor does the stipulation specify
what HHH does after the emulation.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.