Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
On 3/11/2025 9:18 PM, dbush wrote:You did precisely that when you hypothesize different code for HHH.On 3/11/2025 10:06 PM, olcott wrote:*You are simply lying that any input was ever changed*On 3/11/2025 9:02 PM, dbush wrote:>On 3/11/2025 9:41 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:>On 12/03/2025 01:22, olcott wrote:>DDD correctly simulated by HHH never reaches its>
own "return" instruction and terminates normally
in any finite or infinite number of correctly
simulated steps.
If it correctly simulates infinitely many steps, it doesn't terminate. Look up "infinite".
>
But your task is to decide for /any/ program, not just DDD. That, as you are so fond of saying, is 'stipulated', and you can't get out of it. The whole point of the Entscheidungsproblem is its universality. Ignore that, and you have nothing.
>
>
Given that his code has HHH(DD) returning 0,
THESE ARE THE WORDS ANYONE THAT DODGES THESE
WORDS WILL BE TAKEN FOR A LIAR
>
void DDD()
{
HHH(DDD);
return;
}
>
DDD correctly simulated by HHH never reaches its
own "return" instruction and terminates normally
in any finite or infinite number of correctly
simulated steps.
>
Changing the input is not allowed.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.