Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid Mistake or Liars

On 3/13/2025 4:40 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/13/2025 10:38 AM, dbush wrote:

On 3/13/2025 11:29 AM, olcott wrote:

On 3/13/2025 10:09 AM, dbush wrote:

On 3/13/2025 11:04 AM, olcott wrote:

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
When HHH correctly emulates N steps of the
above DDD it cannot possibly reach its own
"return" instruction and terminate normally.
>

>
Irrelevant, as that's not what the halting problem is about.
>

>
We cannot possibly get to how that is relevant to the
problem UNTIL AFTER YOU FIRST ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IT IS TRUE.

>
It's irrelevant because it's not the question.
>
>

 In other words you will make sure to not
agree with anything I say because your
primary goal is disagreement.
 

In other words, you agree that it's irrelevant but don't want to admit it so you just dodge.
As you yourself said:
On 11/10/2024 10:11 AM, olcott wrote:
 > If you had a basis in reasoning to show that I was wrong
 > on this specific point you could provide it. You have no
 > basis in reasoning on this specific point all you have is
 > presumption.