Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Semantic Property of Finite String

On 3/13/25 4:46 PM, olcott wrote:

On 3/13/2025 4:27 AM, joes wrote:

Am Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:41:34 -0500 schrieb olcott:

On 3/12/2025 7:56 PM, dbush wrote:

On 3/12/2025 8:41 PM, olcott wrote:

>
NOT WHEN IT IS STIPULATED THAT THE BEHAVIOR BEING MEASURED IS

>
The direct execution of DDD

>
is proven to be different than the behavior of DDD emulated by HHH
according to the semantics of the x86 language.

>
Which is weird, considering that a simulator should produce the same
behaviour.
>
>

DECIDERS ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT ON THE SEMANTIC OR SYNTACTIC PROPERTY OF
THEIR INPUT FINITE STRINGS.

And not if the input called a different simulator that didn't abort.
>

 DDD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
reach its own final state no matter what HHH
does.
 DDD correctly emulated by HHH1 does reach its
own final state.

Which shows that HHH doesn't correctly emulate its input, unless you just lied and gave the two programs different inputs.

 If someone was not a liar they would say that
these are different computations.
 

Well, they were because they were different inputs, one the DDD that called the HHH that gets stuck in infinite recursion, and the other DDD called the HHH that aborts and returns,
You are just showing that you don't understand the words you are using, and have even gone so far as to admit that fraud, and that you change the meaning of core terms-of-art, so nothing you say has any real meaning anymore.