Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Semantic Property of Finite String

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Semantic Property of Finite String
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 14. Mar 2025, 17:11:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vr1kfo$1ev1a$11@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/14/2025 9:49 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
On 14/03/2025 14:10, Richard Damon wrote:
On 3/13/25 11:55 PM, olcott wrote:
 <snip>
 
In other words you are stupidly trying
to get away with saying that it is impossible
for one C function to call another C function.
>
>
Not at all, just that for a C function to call another C function that other C function must be included as part of the Program that the first is defined in.
 This is an easy area for ambiguity. In this code:
 int bar(void);
int foo(void)
{
   return bar();
}
 bar() is not included, merely prototyped, but it is reasonable to say that foo() is (syntactically) calling bar(). It is /not/ reasonable, though, to claim that we know what foo() will do unless we know for sure what bar() does. And neither is it possible for foo()'s program to run if bar()'s source
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
It has been repeatedly stipulated that a finite number
of steps of DDD are correctly simulated by HHH.

 is not in the module and cannot be tracked down elsewhere by the linker.
 The absence of bar() from ready availability does not mean that foo() isn't calling bar(). It only means that bar() might not be around to hear.
 As is so often the case, whether we're right to claim X depends on what we mean by X.
 
C functions are not programs, but programs can be built from C functions,
 True, although I think one would have to be pretty tight to insist on the distinction in this case.
 
Termination analyzers have been defined to report
on the non-termination of C functions.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-030-99527-0_21.pdf
To determine the termination of a C program the termination
of the main() function is evaluated  on the basis of the
evaluation of the functions that man() calls.
This is ordinary decomposition of a problem into its
constituent parts.

If we can think of C functions as programs, we don't need to emulate anything at all (not that we did, of course); we can just call the function and catch its return vale (if any).
 
This does not work for non-termination analysis when
there is non-termination.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Mar 25 * Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows343olcott
11 Mar 25 +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows25Richard Damon
11 Mar 25 i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows24olcott
11 Mar 25 i +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1dbush
11 Mar 25 i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows21Mikko
11 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows20olcott
11 Mar 25 i i +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows4Mikko
11 Mar 25 i i i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows3olcott
11 Mar 25 i i i +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Damon
12 Mar 25 i i i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Mikko
11 Mar 25 i i +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Damon
16 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows13Mikko
16 Mar 25 i i  +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows11Richard Heathfield
16 Mar 25 i i  i+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows2Mikko
16 Mar 25 i i  ii`- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Heathfield
16 Mar 25 i i  i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows8Keith Thompson
16 Mar 25 i i  i +* Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- original post appended at end6olcott
16 Mar 25 i i  i i+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- original post appended at end4joes
17 Mar 25 i i  i ii`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Correct Emulation Specifies Behavior3olcott
17 Mar 25 i i  i ii +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Correct Emulation Specifies Behavior1joes
17 Mar 25 i i  i ii `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Correct Emulation Specifies Behavior1Richard Damon
17 Mar 25 i i  i i`- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- original post appended at end1Mikko
16 Mar 25 i i  i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Heathfield
16 Mar 25 i i  `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1olcott
11 Mar 25 i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Damon
11 Mar 25 +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows16Fred. Zwarts
11 Mar 25 i+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows12Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 ii`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows11olcott
11 Mar 25 ii +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows5Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 ii i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows4olcott
11 Mar 25 ii i `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows3Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 ii i  `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows2olcott
11 Mar 25 ii i   `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 ii +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows4Mikko
11 Mar 25 ii i+- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 ii i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows2olcott
12 Mar 25 ii i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Mikko
11 Mar 25 ii `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Damon
11 Mar 25 i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows3Mikko
11 Mar 25 i `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows2olcott
11 Mar 25 i  `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Mikko
11 Mar 25 `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows300Mikko
11 Mar 25  `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows299olcott
11 Mar 25   +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows290Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25   i+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows5olcott
11 Mar 25   ii+- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Heathfield
12 Mar 25   ii`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows3Mikko
12 Mar 25   ii `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows2Richard Heathfield
13 Mar 25   ii  `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Mikko
11 Mar 25   i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows284Mike Terry
11 Mar 25   i +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1wij
11 Mar 25   i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows82Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25   i i+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows7wij
11 Mar 25   i ii+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows5Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25   i iii+- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1wij
11 Mar 25   i iii`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows3wij
11 Mar 25   i iii `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows2Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25   i iii  `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1dbush
12 Mar 25   i ii`- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Mikko
11 Mar 25   i i+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows71Mike Terry
11 Mar 25   i ii+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows3Richard Heathfield
12 Mar 25   i iii`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows2Mike Terry
12 Mar 25   i iii `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows1Richard Heathfield
12 Mar 25   i ii+* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows44Fred. Zwarts
12 Mar 25   i iii`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows43Mike Terry
12 Mar 25   i iii `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers42olcott
12 Mar 25   i iii  +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers40Richard Damon
13 Mar 25   i iii  i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers39olcott
13 Mar 25   i iii  i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers3Richard Damon
13 Mar 25   i iii  i i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers2olcott
13 Mar 25   i iii  i i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers1Richard Damon
13 Mar 25   i iii  i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers34Mikko
13 Mar 25   i iii  i i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers33olcott
13 Mar 25   i iii  i i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers3joes
14 Mar 25   i iii  i i i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers2olcott
14 Mar 25   i iii  i i i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers1Richard Damon
14 Mar 25   i iii  i i +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers1Richard Damon
14 Mar 25   i iii  i i +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers1Fred. Zwarts
14 Mar 25   i iii  i i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers23Mikko
14 Mar 25   i iii  i i i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers22olcott
14 Mar 25   i iii  i i i +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers1Richard Damon
15 Mar 25   i iii  i i i `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers20Mikko
15 Mar 25   i iii  i i i  `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement19olcott
15 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement6dbush
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement5olcott
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement3dbush
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement2olcott
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement1dbush
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement1Mikko
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   +- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement1Mikko
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement5Richard Damon
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement4olcott
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement3Richard Damon
17 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i  `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement2olcott
17 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   i   `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement1Richard Damon
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i   `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement6joes
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i    `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement5olcott
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i     `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement4dbush
16 Mar 25   i iii  i i i      `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Paraphrase of Sipser's agreement3olcott
15 Mar 25   i iii  i i `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers4Mikko
13 Mar 25   i iii  i `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers1Fred. Zwarts
13 Mar 25   i iii  `- Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers1Fred. Zwarts
13 Mar 25   i ii`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows23Ben Bacarisse
12 Mar 25   i i`* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows3Mikko
11 Mar 25   i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Stupid Mistake?2olcott
11 Mar 25   i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Counter-Factual ERROR4olcott
12 Mar 25   i +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid Mistake101olcott
12 Mar 25   i `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Mike's very stupid mistake93olcott
11 Mar 25   +* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows3Mikko
11 Mar 25   `* Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows5Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal