Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- posthumous reviewers

On 3/15/2025 5:24 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-03-13 20:56:22 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 3/13/2025 4:22 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-03-13 00:36:04 +0000, olcott said:
>

>
void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}
>
int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
When HHH correctly emulates N steps of the
above functions none of them can possibly reach
their own "return" instruction and terminate normally.

>
Nevertheless, assuming HHH is a decider, Infinite_Loop and Infinite_Recursion
specify a non-terminating behaviour, DDD specifies a terminating behaviour

>
_DDD()
[00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
[00002173] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp  ; housekeeping
[00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
[0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
[0000217f] 83c404     add  esp,+04
[00002182] 5d         pop  ebp
[00002183] c3         ret
Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
>
What is the sequence of machine language
instructions of DDD emulated by HHH such that DDD
reaches its machine address 00002183?
>
Any failure to answer with the sequence of machine
addresses will be construed as
YOU KNOW THAT YOU ARE LYING OR DON'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTON

 That a question is not answered is not a lie.

It is when the claim that I am incorrect is repeated
many many times with many requests for supporting
reasoning showing how I am wrong are totally ignored.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer