Re: neos Universal Compiler

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: neos Universal Compiler
De : mikko.levanto (at) *nospam* iki.fi (Mikko)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 19. Mar 2025, 11:26:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : -
Message-ID : <vre64b$lcu3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-03-18 14:08:50 +0000, Mr Flibble said:

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:59:45 +0200, Mikko wrote:
 
On 2025-03-17 16:53:01 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
 
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:21:05 +0200, Mikko wrote:
 
On 2025-03-16 18:40:42 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
 
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 12:28:24 +0200, Mikko wrote:
 
On 2025-03-15 15:08:47 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
 
On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:55:52 +0200, Mikko wrote:
 
On 2025-03-15 04:00:52 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
 
Hi!
 neos universal compiler (that can compile any programming
language)
is successfully running the tokenization stage tokenizing a
program written in the neos reference language. #cpp #coding
#compiler #compsci #gamedev
 /Flibble
 Can it tokenize FORTRAN 60 or FORTRAN IV ?
 ANY programming language.
 /Flibble
 How is neos configured to tokenize FORTRAN 60 ?
 The same way you would configure it for any other programming
language.
 If it is configured the same for each programming language then how
does it know how to tokenize?
 You configure it by providing a language specific neosBNF schema
(grammar)
file (an input to the compilalation process).
 Is there a neosBNF schema that describes the tokens of FORtRAN 66 or
Algol 60?
 Not yet.
The definition of string literal of Algol 60 would be a good example
of something that cannot be defined with a regular expression and is
therefore impossible or at least complicated with an ordinary tokenizer.
--
Mikko

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Mar 25 * Re: neos Universal Compiler35Mikko
16 Mar 25 +* Re: neos Universal Compiler28Mikko
17 Mar 25 i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler27Mikko
18 Mar 25 i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler26Mikko
18 Mar 25 i  +* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler3Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  i  `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Richard Heathfield
18 Mar 25 i  +- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Andy Walker
19 Mar 25 i  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler20Mikko
19 Mar 25 i   +* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Alan Mackenzie
19 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler3Mikko
20 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Alan Mackenzie
20 Mar 25 i   i  `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko
19 Mar 25 i   `* Re: neos Universal Compiler15Mikko
28 Mar 25 i    `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV14Mikko
28 Mar 25 i     +* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV5Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV4Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV3Jeff Barnett
29 Mar 25 i     i  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Jeff Barnett
30 Mar 25 i     i   `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Richard Heathfield
29 Mar 25 i     `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV8Mikko
29 Mar 25 i      `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV7Richard Heathfield
29 Mar 25 i       +- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Richard Heathfield
30 Mar 25 i       +* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV3Mikko
30 Mar 25 i       i`* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Richard Heathfield
31 Mar 25 i       i `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Mikko
30 Mar 25 i       `* Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV2Mikko
31 Mar 25 i        `- Re: neos Universal Compiler and FORTRAN IV1Mikko
16 Mar 25 +* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Richard Heathfield
17 Mar 25 i`- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko
30 Mar 25 `* Re: neos Universal Compiler4Keith Thompson
30 Mar 25  +- Re: neos Universal Compiler1joes
30 Mar 25  `* Re: neos Universal Compiler2Mikko
31 Mar 25   `- Re: neos Universal Compiler1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal