Sujet : Re: neos Universal Compiler
De : acm (at) *nospam* muc.de (Alan Mackenzie)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 19. Mar 2025, 12:02:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : muc.de e.V.
Message-ID : <vre88p$7kb$1@news.muc.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64))
Mikko <
mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
On 2025-03-18 14:08:50 +0000, Mr Flibble said:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:59:45 +0200, Mikko wrote:
[ .... ]
Is there a neosBNF schema that describes the tokens of FORtRAN 66 or
Algol 60?
Not yet.
The definition of string literal of Algol 60 would be a good example
of something that cannot be defined with a regular expression and is
therefore impossible or at least complicated with an ordinary tokenizer.
Would you please be more specific about just what in an Algol 60 string
literal prevents a regexp from parsing it. Not for any special reason,
just that I'm curious. Maybe an example of such a string would be
interesting. Thanks!
--
Mikko
-- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).