Re: neos Universal Compiler

Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:

On 2025-03-18 14:08:50 +0000, Mr Flibble said:

 

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:59:45 +0200, Mikko wrote:

 [ .... ]
 

Is there a neosBNF schema that describes the tokens of FORtRAN 66 or
Algol 60?

 

Not yet.

 

The definition of string literal of Algol 60 would be a good example
of something that cannot be defined with a regular expression and is
therefore impossible or at least complicated with an ordinary tokenizer.

 Would you please be more specific about just what in an Algol 60 string
literal prevents a regexp from parsing it.  Not for any special reason,
just that I'm curious.  Maybe an example of such a string would be
interesting.  Thanks!
 

--
Mikko