Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions

Liste des GroupesRevenir à theory 
Sujet : Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions
De : agisaak (at) *nospam* gm.invalid (André G. Isaak)
Groupes : comp.theory
Date : 25. Mar 2025, 02:46:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Christians and Atheists United Against Creeping Agnosticism
Message-ID : <vrt1tu$257a2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2025-03-24 19:33, olcott wrote:
On 3/24/2025 7:00 PM, André G. Isaak wrote:

In the post you were responding to I pointed out that computable functions are mathematical objects.
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computable_function
 Computable functions implemented using models of computation
would seem to be more concrete than pure math functions.
Those are called computations or algorithms, not computable functions.
The halting problems asks whether there *is* an algorithm which can compute the halting function, but the halting function itself is a purely mathematical object which exists prior to, and independent of, any such algorithm (if one existed).

For example pure math functions don't have any specific
storage like a tape or machine registers.
No they don't. Why would they? A mathematical function is simply a static mapping from elements of a domain to elements of a codomain.

This also would seem to mean that they would require
some actual input.
 
The above copypasta doesn't address this.
>
I pointed out that the domain of a computable function needn't be a string. The above copypasta doesn't address this.
>
 When implemented using an actual model of computation
some concrete form or input seems required.
 
I pointed out that there is no bijection natural numbers and strings,
 finite strings of decimal digits: [0123456789]
 
but rather a one-to-many relation. The above copypasta doesn't address this.
 "12579" would seem to have a bijective mapping to
a single natural number.
The natural number 12579 maps equally to the (decimal) string '012579', '0012579',... so there is no bijection.

>
I pointed out that the exact same sort of one-to-many relation exists between computations and strings. The above copypasta doesn't address this.
>
 I pointed out above that the finite string of x86
machine code correctly emulated by EEE DOES
NOT MAP TO THE BEHAVIOR OF ITS DIRECT EXECUTION.
But I was not talking about EEE. I was talking about the halting function. All you seem to be claiming above is that whatever EEE computes, it isn't the halting function. Everyone already agrees to that.
André
--
To email remove 'invalid' & replace 'gm' with well known Google mail service.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Mar 25 * Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions75olcott
24 Mar 25 +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions69dbush
24 Mar 25 i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions68olcott
24 Mar 25 i +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions3dbush
24 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions2olcott
25 Mar 25 i i `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1joes
24 Mar 25 i +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions62André G. Isaak
24 Mar 25 i i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions61olcott
24 Mar 25 i i +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions57André G. Isaak
25 Mar 25 i i i+* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions55olcott
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions41André G. Isaak
25 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions40olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions39André G. Isaak
25 Mar 25 i i iii  `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions38olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions36André G. Isaak
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions35olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions33dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions32olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions6joes
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions5olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions3dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions2olcott
26 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i i `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Mikko
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions5Mikko
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions4olcott
26 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Mikko
26 Mar 25 i i iii   i i i `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions19dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i  `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions18olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i   `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions17dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i    `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions16olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions14dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions13olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions12dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i  `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions11olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   +* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions9dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   i`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions ---HHH(DD)8olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   i `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions ---HHH(DD)7dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   i  `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions ---HHH(DD)6olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   i   `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions ---HHH(DD)5dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   i    `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions ---HHH(DD)4olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   i     +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions ---HHH(DD)1dbush
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   i     +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions ---HHH(DD)1joes
26 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   i     `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions ---HHH(DD)1Fred. Zwarts
26 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     i   `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Fred. Zwarts
26 Mar 25 i i iii   i i     `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 25 i i iii   i `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 i i iii   `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 i i ii+* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions10joes
25 Mar 25 i i iii+* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions6olcott
25 Mar 25 i i iiii+* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions4joes
25 Mar 25 i i iiiii`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions3olcott
26 Mar 25 i i iiiii +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i i iiiii `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1joes
26 Mar 25 i i iiii`- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 i i iii`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions3olcott
26 Mar 25 i i iii +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
26 Mar 25 i i iii `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 25 i i ii`* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions3Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 25 i i ii `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions2olcott
26 Mar 25 i i ii  `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 25 i i i`- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Mikko
25 Mar 25 i i `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions3joes
25 Mar 25 i i  `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions2olcott
26 Mar 25 i i   `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 i +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Mikko
25 Mar 25 i `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Fred. Zwarts
25 Mar 25 +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Richard Damon
25 Mar 25 `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions4Mikko
25 Mar 25  `* Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions3olcott
26 Mar 25   +- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Mikko
26 Mar 25   `- Re: Correcting the definition of the halting problem --- Computable functions1Fred. Zwarts

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal