Liste des Groupes | Revenir à theory |
Am Tue, 25 Mar 2025 07:00:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 3/25/2025 3:37 AM, joes wrote:Am Mon, 24 Mar 2025 21:13:51 -0500 schrieb olcott:On 3/24/2025 8:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/24/25 10:14 AM, olcott wrote:On 3/24/2025 6:23 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/23/25 9:06 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/23/2025 6:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/23/25 6:47 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/23/2025 4:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/23/25 1:21 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/23/2025 6:07 AM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/22/25 11:52 PM, olcott wrote:On 3/22/2025 9:53 PM, Richard Damon wrote:On 3/22/25 2:08 PM, olcott wrote:There exists no Natural Number N number of steps of III
correctly emulated by EEE where III reaches its own "ret"
instruction and terminates normally.But there is an N after which III returns.Right, and thus you must consider *ALL* of that memory as theYou haven't yet noticed that all posts with this title [III
input, so if you change it, it is a different input.
correctly emulated by EEE] are talking about a pure emulator that
emulates a finite number of instructions of III.Then it is not pure.DDD, the input, halts.The DDD that halts IS NOT AN ACTUAL INPUT TO HHH.
Then what is? Another program with the same name that doesn't?An entirely different instance that has different behavior.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.